Below are the Pluses 
, Deltas 
, Big Ideas 
and Questions 
from each day.
, Deltas , Big Ideas and Questions from each day.Notes about the content below
If I saw the same thing multiple times, I put a +# in front of it to show that multiple people called out the same item. If we did something in response to a sticky, I put the thing we did in (parens) after the item.
Day 1 - Setting up how we work, working through one example.
Having a SME and Researchers at each table Meeting People & Working Together Lots of tacit knowledge in the room Good sharing as a group Excellent workshop process Really good "warm-ups" for the start of the meeting Small groups are conductive to relationship building. Will be good for remote collaborations in future Good to have an ITANA board member at each table We have "enough"structure to be productive good flexibility too Right people to talk about various subjects Internalizing understanding Insights from "the trenches" Excellent collaborators Drive good productive work Normalizes understanding add resources and links in Google doc Identifying upfront what we know and weak areas Good to have SME at table with so little time A diversity of technical views of the group Investment Value Matrix is a great strategic planning tool but needs to have consensus of business value |
Publish the results as an ITANA handbook Need common nomenclature Capture synonyms (created the Work Process Chart) Levels of complexity in seemingly simple approaches Should we identify our (TIANA) capabilities? This would provide an alternative view than just tools (Shared the ITANA Capability Map) Will need to follow up with work e.g., to relate the models (Did the categorization mapping) |
+4 Time management in break-out groups. (next day projected a timer and gave time checks) Get the big ideas first, then details (created the Work Process Chart) Not everyone was introduced at the beginning of the meeting (did this the next day) Need someone to facilitated to keep focus on critical items How to explain the value of EA or how it generates customer value. (The mantra: Get the Right People in the Right Conversation about the Right Problem) |
How do we capture the value of the F2F process How do we share this after the F2F How are the tools interconnected (showed the Business Strategy on a Page that had Capabilities at its center) Post workshop curation of artifacts (We asked for Stewards for each artifact) Establishment of Architecture Practice Artifact needed to communicate the relationships that explain value - value chain map? Are we intending to improve the artifacts? Or document them? Both? Inserting screenshots, diagrams in docs Break up within the table to work on different sections Is it possible to create the unified meta-vision What makes higher ed so much different that other businesses?
|
Overview
Content Tools