|
Oracle SOA suite |
IBM websphere |
Microsoft Biztalk |
JBoss Enterprise SOA Suite |
SAP Netweaver |
TIBCO ActiveMatrix |
Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cornell |
Oracle SOA suite |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgetown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UMUC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UofT |
|
Note: using part of the Websphere suite: Message Broker |
|
|
|
|
|
MIT |
|
|
|
|
SAP NetWeaver 7.3 |
|
|
UW |
|
|
Microsoft Biztalk |
|
|
|
|
UW-M |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UC-Irvine |
Oracle SOA suite |
|
|
JBoss SOA |
|
|
|
UofT
Implementing a small (100-150msg/sec) enterprise implementation. We'll scale it up as business demands increase.
MIT
We might be using a bit of SAP in places but we're not using any suite for everything or as a strategy
UW
Only local implementations (not enterprise)
UC-Irvine
JBoss SOA suite: Production
Oracle SOA suite:Development
|
Mulesoft |
WSO2 ESB |
Fuse (built on ServiceMix) |
Apache ServiceMix |
JBoss ESB |
KSB (Kuali Service Bus) |
Other Messaging |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
JBoss HornetQ |
Michigan |
|
WSO2 * |
|
|
|
|
|
Cornell |
|
|
|
|
|
KSB |
|
Georgetown |
|
|
|
|
|
KSB(1) |
|
Ohio |
|
WSO2 * |
|
|
|
|
|
UMUC |
|
WSO2 ESB |
|
|
|
|
|
UofT |
|
|
|
|
|
KSB |
WMB (formally MQ Integrator and MQ Series) |
MIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UW |
|
|
|
|
|
KSB |
|
UW-M |
|
WSO2 ESB, Fuse |
|
|
|
|
Cape Clear |
UC-Irvine |
|
|
Fuse |
ServiceMix |
JBoss ESB |
KSB |
|
* Investigating: lead contender
(1) but KSB is not part of the roadmap*
Ohio
Exploring Enterprise Service Buses, Service Registries, etc. (WS02, Mule, Fuse, JBoss)
We have KSB but it is not our target.
UMUC
Implementing for production
UofT
Implementing a small (100-150msg/sec) enterprise implementation. We'll scale it up as business demands increase.
UW
KSB usage is local
Exploring Oracle Service Bus
UM-W
Cape Clear is in retirement
Oracle, Fuse and WSO2 will soon be set up as part of our integration testbed
UC-Irvine
|
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
WS-Transaction |
BPEL |
SAML |
WS-Security |
WS-Trust |
WS-Policy |
Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
SAML |
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
WS-Security |
|
|
|
Cornell |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgetown |
|
|
|
SAML |
|
|
|
|
Ohio |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
WS-Transaction |
|
SAML |
WS-Security |
|
|
|
UMUC |
|
|
|
SAML |
WS-Security |
|
|
|
UofT |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
SAML |
WS-Security |
|
|
|
MIT |
JAX-WS,JAX-B |
|
|
SAML |
|
|
|
|
UW |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
SAML |
|
|
|
|
UW-M |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
BPEL |
SAML |
WS-Security |
|
|
|
UC-Irvine |
JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
BPEL |
SAML |
|
|
|
|
|
Bus |
Hub-and-spoke |
Point-to-point |
Federated |
Other |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
Y |
|
Y |
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
Y |
|
|
Cornell |
|
|
Y |
|
|
Georgetown |
|
|
Y |
|
|
UMUC |
Y |
Y |
Y |
Y |
|
UofT |
|
Y |
|
|
|
MIT |
|
|
Y |
|
|
UW |
Y |
|
|
|
|
UW-M |
Y |
|
|
|
|
UC-Irvine |
|
|
|
|
A mixture of topologies |
UMUC Yes - the ability to integrate via SOA/web services is a key determinant we evaluate new products on.
UofT
Yes. SOA is being talked about as a "game-changer". The business people quickly recognize the benefits of SOA, while the IT people seem to warm to it much more slowly, possibly because they see more implementation challenges than do the business folk.
MIT
Yes, but project priorities have delayed any progress in this direction
UW
We don't have a clearly articulated technology roadmap
Pub-sub may have a greater impact than web services
UW-M
Not much yet. I imagine we'll see a lot or planning in the coming eighteen months.
UC-Irvine
SOA has changed the roadmap, primarily because people started thinking about real time.