Page History

...

• TOGAF was the common framework.  
  • Most people at a maturity of 1 - 2.
  • People like TOGAF because it is specific and proscriptive
  • Good available samples
  • Layers Conceptual -> Logical -> Physical work well
  • U Mich pulled out specific best practicss
• Tools
  • MS Office or similar Google Docs, Wikis are what most people use.  It is the lowest common denominator.
  • UBC used Troux (http://www.troux.com/^{Image Removed}) to do an engagement analysis mapping capabilities to technology to show gaps and overlaps.  Part of strategic planning
  • UMUC uses Sparx (http://www.sparxsystems.com/^{Image Removed}) but dislike it and are stopping.
  • Archi (http://archi.cetis.ac.uk/^{Image Removed}) maps to UML and is a simple tool for working with Archimate (http://www.opengroup.org/subjectareas/enterprise/archimate^{Image Removed})
  • Scott Fullerton at UW-Madison likes to use UML and MagicDraw UML because it enforces rigor when you need to make sure things are rigorous.