Page History
...
| Locally developed solution for mutual authentication | An n-tier solution such as Shibboleth ECP or CILogon | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
UMUC |
|
| WS-Security via SAML assertions |
UofT |
| |
|
MIT | |
|
|
UW-M | |
|
|
UW |
| |
|
UC-Irvine | |
|
|
Colorado | |
|
|
7.4 After requests are authenticated, do services access another service to determine what the requestor is authorized to do?
| This is not a goal | This is an architecture goal but it is only sometimes implemented | This is consistently implemented for services in the local domain | This is consistently implemented for services in the local domain and in the cloud | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMUC |
|
|
|
|
|
UofT |
|
|
|
|
|
MIT |
|
|
|
|
|
UW-M |
|
|
|
|
|
UW |
|
|
|
|
|
UC-Irvine |
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 More generally, how do you manage trust between distributed components ?
...
Overview
Content Tools