Page History
...
| Oracle SOA suite | IBM websphere | Microsoft Biztalk | JBoss Enterprise SOA Suite | SAP Netweaver | TIBCO ActiveMatrix | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cornell | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgetown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio State |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UMUC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UofT |
| Note: using part of the Websphere suite: Message Broker |
|
|
|
|
|
MIT |
|
|
|
| SAP NetWeaver 7.3 |
|
|
Washington UW |
|
| Microsoft Biztalk |
|
|
|
|
UW-M Madison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UC-Irvine | |
|
| |
|
|
|
Colorado | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana | Oracle SOA suite |
|
| JBoss SOA |
|
|
|
9.2 Indicate whether this is a) exploration b) a pilot or, c) an enterprise implementation
UofT
Using part of the Websphere suite: Message Broker. Implementing a small (100-150msg/sec) enterprise implementation. We'll scale it up as business demands increase.
...
We might be using a bit of SAP in places but we're not using any suite for everything or as a strategy
UWWashington
Only local implementations (not enterprise)
UC-Irvine
JBoss SOA suite: Production
Oracle SOA suite:Development
Colorado
Pilot is implemented, primarily focusing on the Oracle Service Bus component. Goal for the next year is to have an Enterprise class implementation
9.3 Are you using one or more of the following service bus applications?
| Mulesoft | WSO2 ESB | Fuse (built on ServiceMix) | Apache ServiceMix | JBoss ESB | KSB (Kuali Service Bus) | Other Messaging | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC |
|
|
|
|
| JBoss HornetQ | |||||
Michigan |
| WSO2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cornell |
|
|
|
|
| KSB |
| ||||
Georgetown |
|
|
|
|
| KSB |
| ||||
Ohio State |
| WSO2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
UMUC |
| WSO2 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
UofT |
|
|
|
|
| KSB | WMB (formally MQ Integrator and MQ Series) | ||||
MIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Washington UW |
|
|
|
|
| KSB |
| ||||
UW-M Madison |
| WSO2 ESB, Fuse | | |
|
|
| Cape Clear | |||
UC-Irvine |
|
| | | | |
| ||||
Colorado |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Indiana |
|
|
|
|
| | Fuse | ServiceMix | JBoss ESB | KSB |
|
* Investigating: lead contender
...
9.4 Indicate whether this is a) exploration b) a pilot or, c) an enterprise implementation
Ohio State
Exploring Enterprise Service Buses, Service Registries, etc. (WS02WSO2, Mule, Fuse, JBoss)
We have KSB but it is not our target.
...
UofT
Implementing a small (100-150msg/sec) enterprise implementation. We'll scale it up as business demands increase.
WashingtonUW
KSB usage is local
Exploring Oracle Service Bus
...
- Apache: production
- JBoss: production
- Fuse: proof of concept
- KSB: In development (between b and c)
Indiana
We have an enterprise implementation of Kuali Rice + KSB.
9.5 Which enterprise services are connected via a bus?
- UBC: SIS & Learning Tools provisioning engine, ePayment
- Cornell:Kuali Rice, Kuali Financials, standalone custom Rice-based applications
- Ohio State: none at present
- UMUC: We are exposing and aggregating delivered services in PeopleSoft Campus Solutions for Student Accounts to our CRM platform. We are also working to connect real time IMS LIS to the bus.
- UofT: Student Contact Information is about to go into production.
- UWWashington: KSB: Kuali CDM and myPlan and KIM
- UW-M Madison Certain Person Services, Curricular data services
- UC-Irvine: Apache SOA without the service bus has been in production for two years handling Timesheet and Facilities Work Order management processes.
We are bringing up the service bus now primarily for data warehousing. - Colorado:Basic student profile information, user provisioning and update flows
- Indiana: Workflow, Identity Management, Calendar, Portal, Notification, Student Services, Research Administration, Enterprise Calendar, HR system, Leave Management, Travel System, Purchasing, etc.
9.6, 9.7 Which of the following technology standards do you use?
| JAX-WS, JAX-B | WS-Transaction | BPEL | SAML | WS-Security | WS-Trust | WS-Policy | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
| SAML |
|
|
|
|
Michigan |
|
|
|
| WS-Security |
|
|
|
Cornell | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Georgetown |
|
|
| SAML |
|
|
|
|
Ohio State | JAX-WS, JAX-B | WS-Transaction |
| SAML | WS-Security |
|
|
|
UMUC |
|
|
| SAML | WS-Security |
|
|
|
UofT | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
| SAML | WS-Security |
|
|
|
MIT | JAX-WS,JAX-B |
|
| SAML |
|
|
|
|
Washington UW | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
| SAML |
|
|
|
|
UW-M -Madison | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
| BPEL | SAML | WS-Security |
|
|
|
UC-Irvine | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
| BPEL | SAML | WS-Security |
| WS_Policy |
|
Colorado | JAX-WS, JAX-B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indiana | JAX-WS, JAX-B, JAX-RS |
|
| SAML | WS-SECURITY |
|
| oath |
9.6 How would you describe the logical topology of your SOA?
| Bus | Hub-and-spoke | Point-to-point | Federated | Other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBC | Y |
| Y |
|
|
Michigan |
| Y |
|
| |
Cornell |
|
| Y |
|
|
Georgetown |
| Y |
|
| |
UMUC | Y | Y | Y | Y |
|
UofT |
| Y |
|
|
|
MIT |
|
| Y |
|
|
Washington UW | Y |
|
|
|
|
UW-M | Y |
|
|
|
|
UC-Irvine |
|
|
|
| A mixture of topologies |
Colorado |
|
|
|
| A mixture of topologies |
Indiana Y |
|
|
|
| A mixture of topologies |
9.9 Has the introduction of SOA related technologies altered your enterprise technology road-map?
...
MIT
Yes, but project priorities have delayed any progress in this direction
WashingtonUW
We don't have a clearly articulated technology roadmap
Pub-sub may have a greater impact than web services
UW-MMadison
Not much yet. I imagine we'll see a lot or planning in the coming eighteen months.
UC-Irvine
SOA has changed the roadmap, primarily because people started thinking about real time.
Overview
Content Tools