You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

The Challenges

  • We have a vetted list of requirements that an IdP would have to meet in order to serve the need for an Open R&S Identity (ORSID) Provider.
  • We want to define a standard process by which federations can assess candidate ORSID providers and tag the approved ORSIDs.
  • We want to assure the long-term stability of identifiers issued by ORSID providers.
  • We want to assure that a person always has the option to migrate from one ORSID provider to another.
  • We want to allow individuals to carry the same identifier even if they move from one ORSID provider to another.
  • We want to assure that ORSID services are continuously available as long as they are filling a need for the Research and Scholarship community.

The Plan

  • InCommon to collaborate with the UK Access Management Federation in defining a process for managing the evaluation and tagging of candidate ORSIDs.
  • InCommon and the UK federation will tag at least one ORSID as soon as feasible and assure that it operates for a minimum of two years
  • The InCommon and UK federations will seek to designate additional IdPs as ORSIDs with the goal of having at least two production ORSID providers in operation at any one time
  • ...

 

  • No labels