You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Questions
 - How familiar can we expect the internet 2 audience to be with library issues and resources?

Take aways
 - Adding shib to to a library access control infrastructure adds value (even in a hybrid env),
 - Address the various "perception" issues that are floating thru librarian space
 - Convince the audience that the deploy is doable....

Problem definition
 - Need improve the library community's ability to easily access licensed, off-site resources

Why this is compelling - what is wrong with the current situation
 - Key points that others think would be compelling to the internet 2 audience?
 - Should we outline other advantages of implementing shib (consistency of logins across campus/library/vendors, ability to license resources for subgroups, etc) as actual problems, or as side benefits of addressing the core issue of offsite access?

Vision of the future - how should this work
 - What do we want our environments to look like or act like

How do we get there
 + User scenario walkthrough (With UW / EZProxy solution?)
   - Public access workstation
   - Multiple resource use
   - Use of link resolvers

 + Address key issues in place
   - Understanding the hybrid environment (some shib'ed, some not) 
   - Allowing both personalized and guest access
   - State of Vendor adoption 
   + Business process issues
     - managing permissions
     - policy/standards for attribute release
     - library users who need access but who are not in the campus directory
   - Difficulty/resources/effort needed for implementation
   + Protecting user privacy
     - attribute release
     - unique IdP for vendor/user combinations
     - need for graceful logout process for kiosks
   + Browser User Experience navigating the WAYF
     - on campus
     - link resolvers

Next steps
 - Resources available
 - How to get involved

  • No labels