OSIdM4HE-Strategy&Org. call, 5pm - 6pm (ET) Friday, 8/25/2011
Participants
Who |
With |
Present |
|---|---|---|
Tom Barton |
U Chicago |
|
Dedra Chamberlin |
Berkeley & UCSF |
|
Jacob Farmer |
Indiana U |
|
Keith Hazelton |
UW-Madison / Internet2 |
x |
RL "Bob" Morgan |
U Dub / Internet2 |
|
Benn Oshrin |
Internet2 / Various |
x |
Hampton Sublett |
UC Davis |
x |
Bill Yock |
U Dub/Rice Board |
x |
AGENDA
1. Convene
Ideas for format of Sept. 16: Audio/Video? F2F doesn't seem likely; Conference East / Conference West?
Does this wear the hat of Jasig Comm of Practice?
5-9 committed ppl to further the conversation. Registry subcommittee.
Does this wear the hat of contributions to RICE/KIM.
Deliverables/Goals for us: Strawman proposal(s) for how this can work.
The recommendations that the three groups put forth will have to play nicely with each other. (Reg/Prov/AcMgmt)
Grouper & Rice may continue in parallel...
We don't have to upset the apple cart of work underway. OpenRegistry would fit under Jasig. Provisioning? End up needing two provisioning: federated (SAML) and enterprise. Provisioning connectors.
Agree on service interfaces. Then parties can go off & code implementations & connectors.
S&O role would be to offer guidelines to the func/dev teams along lines of ent. infr. req.
So there's a tech team and a (Organizational politics, PR and Grantsmanship)
Board acknowledges that current model needs augmentation whether new partnerships
HS works as lead in Kuali infra roadmap
HS: Ent Sys Req. team; Org Structure & Strategies team;
BO: Call them action items rather than teams for now.
HS: KH owns ESR AI; HS owns OSS AI; looking for helpers....
BO: As for September 16 logistics: If it's a big mass webconf; use WebEx's feature
KH: Proposal to RICE re vent partner could be centered on Registry & AccManagement; I2/JasigCOmanage could be centered on Provisioning.
BY: Concerned about how do dependencies play out when actual velocities of component efforts end up being quite far apart?
BY: There are some advantages to having everything under one governance & resource tent. Some improved chances of success.
HS: You might get Berkeley to contribute to one, & Davis to another, but if it's under a big umbrella then you might attract UC resources
2. Agenda Bash
3. AI review
- Done: Draft Proposal on New Model of Collaborative Middleware Development
- Done Draft charge for S&O Team with thoughts on how we make progress toward our goals
- [OSIdM4HEteam:RL-Bob] Documenting the gaps that have no team (yet). AuthN is one example.
4. Review Bill Yock's revised draft on Investment and Governance Models
I made several edits to the draft investment models to incorporate some feedback I received and get it ready to present to the Rice board this week. I added some barrier comments and enhanced several participation statements. Would appreciate any comments on it. If these look good I am happy to start drafting a MOU regarding the collaboration model.
5. Review Hampton Sublett's draft S&O Team Charge
6. Do we really understand the HE & research market for (Open Source) IAM?
7. Should S&O maintain a Cross-Team Set of Enterprise Infrastructure Requirements?
8. Review New Action Items