You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Next »

 

 

Narrative:

  1. Record is created in institutional source system.
  2. Institutionally defined logic invokes the Person Registration and Update service
  3. Person Registration and Update service invokes search / match to determine if the record supplied matches an existing record
    1. If search / match returns a definite match, person registration invokes Identifier Assignment to generate any additional identifiers (if needed), registers new person, address and affiliation data to Person Data Store and puts a message on the Person Update queue
    2. If search / match returns a possible match (verification required), Person Registration puts a message in a Person Record Verification queue, where Orchestration Engine will see it and fire a workflow. Should we define what the outcome of the workflow will be, or should that be institutionally defined?
    1. If search / match returns no possible match, person registration invokes Identifier Assignment to generate any needed identifiers,  registers record to Person Data Store , and puts a message on the Person Update queue.
  4. Orchestration engine triggers refresh of data-driven group information in the Groups Service based on message in Person Update queue
    1. Or, should Groups service just poll the queue for Person Updates and pull new data as needed?
  5. Orchestration engine invokes rule-based provisioning in Provisioning Service.
    1. Or, should Provisioning Service poll a queue for group updates?
  6. Accounts and access are provisioned according to data-driven group membership
  7. Provisioning system may generate identifiers. If so, it will (call Identifier Assignment || insert into Person Update queue)
  8. Provisioning system may generate additional group memberships. If so, it will (call Groups API || insert into Person Update queue)

 

 

  • No labels