Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Notes from Performance Working Group Call, Monday June 22, 2009

Attending

Wiki Markup
Notes from Perf WG Monday June 22, 09
Jason
Carla
Aaron Brown, Internet2
Jeff
Chris Oxensen
Joe
Ahzer
Carla
Emily Eisbruch
Start w Internet2 updates
Jeff,
Software deve. New RCs of perfo release candidates in past month
Working up to finanl release. Working up to Perfsonar Buy w OWAMP
Updates on Joint Techs
BGP Tutorial
Mini Network Perforamcne
VGP
Sunday of Joint Techs
Not much electrical plugs in meeting roms this
Monday, 3:30
Tuesday, a session on Multi Domain.....
Great, thanks Jeff
Next item is community updates.  Open up the floor to anyone who has something going on that they'd like to share w the group.
Joe: we've been trying to get a handle on IpV6 measurement data. Not possible to do ? on the Junipers,
Special filters put in place ot do some of that .   See if we can get data from the PCs .  Anonymous ? process for ?  No consensus for IPv6 side. Can we talk about that today?
Might not have right people on this call. Don't have folks w much IpV6 knowledge.
Carla: it's a topic we could take back to the NTAC for disucsion
Discuss it on this call another time. Maybe at Joint Techs.  Yes bring it up in Indianapolis.
AI - Carla will put this on the agenda.  IpV6
Working Group Charter
Take it forth to the NTAC before Joint Techs?
AI - Carla will send link out to the group for the charter.  Send feedback to Carla
AI anyone w agenda items send them to Carla
Joe - I didn't mean to shut down the topic.  Folks interested in a V6 security project. It would require some visibility.
Jeff: even in v4 space, there has been discussion of revisiting the anonymousation.
\[AI\] Joe will Send a summary to list on what you are looking for in the way of IPv6 securtiy. And recommondeations
There are assumptions in ipv4 space on address boundaries local vs non local . In v6 address allocations policies are so varied.  Could be tricky. Need to tease out. Anything below a 64 is not defensible.  Above that , it's interesting.
Joe, I'd add on to what Jeff said, send a summary plus your recommendations.
Intentd to have final release before Joint Techs