...
----------
Augmented Contextual Integrity Decision Heuristic1.
- Describe the new practice in terms of information flows.
...
- Identify the prevailing context. Establish context at a familiar level of generality (e.g., “health care”) and identify potential impacts from contexts nested within it, such as “teaching hospital.”
...
- Identify information subjects, senders, and recipients.
...
- Identify transmission principles.
...
- Locate applicable entrenched informational norms and identify significant points of departure.
...
- Prima facie assessment: There may be various ways a system or practice defies entrenched norms.
...
- Evaluation I: What might be the harms, the threats to autonomy and freedom? What might be the effects on power structures, implications for justice, fairness, equality, social hierarchy, democracy, and so on?
...
- Evaluation II: Ask how the system or practices directly impinge on values, goals, and ends of the context. In addition, consider the meaning or significance of moral and political factors in light of contextual values, ends, purposes, and goals.
...
- On the basis of these findings, contextual integrity recommends in favor of or against systems or practices under study.
Nissenbaum, Helen (2009-11-24). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life (Stanford Law Books) (Kindle Locations 3481-3487). Stanford University Press - A. Kindle Edition.
...