|Number||Current Text||Proposed Text / Query / Suggestion||Proposer||+1 (add your name here if you agree with the proposal)||Action|
CILogon has become a critical service for existing collaborations as well as a foundation for broader collaboration, but there is currently no sustainability model.
|CILogon has become a critical service for existing collaborations as well as a foundation for broader collaboration, but its current subscription-based sustainability model could benefit from more stable, long-term support.||James Basney (illinois.edu)||The text will be modified as suggested.|
|2||(p36, sB.11, para #2)|
The number of participating national identity federations (IDFs) has grown from a handful to 18 in mid 2017, enabling user’s from 1577 organisations to use single sign-on to login to CLARIN services.
|The number of participating national identity federations (IDFs) has grown from a handful to 18 in mid 2017, enabling users from 1577 organisations to use single sign-on to login to CLARIN services.||This was in the original FIM4Rv2 paper ("Federated Identity Management for Research Collaborations"), which is already final.|
(Gap3 - page 10 IdP of last resort)
Researchers from institutions that have not federated their IAM systems are not well served. An IdP of Last Resort that releases R&S attributes and can be used internationally is needed.
|Researchers from institutions that have not federated their IAM systems are not well served. An IdP or perhaps a set of regional IdPs (hosted in Research Computing facilities) of Last Resort that releases R&S attributes and can be used internationally is needed.|
|The text will be modified as suggested.|
|4||Recommendations related to IdPs as a Service and IdPs of Last Resort.||Be more explicit about which of these is indicated, and how they support research activities.||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||The recommendations related to IdPaaS and IdPoLR will be made more explicit.|
|5||OIDC||There should be more explicit recommendations regarding use cases that are not handled well with SAML||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||The recommendation has been modified to be more explicit.|
|6||Timeline||Consider adding a timeline for recommended actions.||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||The decision was not to provide a timeline but to emphasize the need for a roadmap as a next step.|
|7||The paper's focus on recommendations for InCommon||Consider adding recommendations for the other "strata" in the FIM4Rv2 report (e.g., identity providers, research service providers, software developers).||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||The decision was not to expand the scope of the recommendations, but there is already text highlighting Internet2's unique role to foster action by other "strata."|
|8||Security||Consider more explicit recommendations for SIRTFI, proactive security assessments, etc.||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||Text has been added to specify compliance with SIRTFI, but SIRTFI-specific recommendations were considered out of scope.|
|9||Outreach||Consider help for campuses to bridge the gap between researchers and their IAM staff. Also explore ways to reach out to researchers directly.||Oct-18-2018 Open CACTI meeting at TechEx in Orlando||Text has been added to recommend information exchange and partnerships between these communities.|
Improve clarity of collaboration as a service pivoting on adopters (both sites and projects) understanding the tools, readiness and/or maturity of campus IAM solutions to allow ease of use such that adoption barriers are minimal.
|Nov 9 Author's meeting||The text has been edited for clarity.|
For each of the authors listed, please provide the ORCID ID where possible.
Nicholas Roy: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6515-4316
|Emily Eisbruch||ORCIDs have been added to the list of authors.|