This page is an output of the Itana Spring Face2Face 2016 meeting, contributed to the Itana wiki by the meeting attendees.
Understanding and classifying the goals of an engagement for the purpose of designing a meeting structure best suited for achieving those goals. Factors for classification include, persuasive vs shared vision, generating outcomes vs artifacts, …
Planning a meeting ideally involves describing the facilitation techniques that will best realize the objectives for the identified participants.
The goals/purpose are well defined (what will people leave with?)
Type of meeting is defined based upon goals desired
The techniques for achieving the goals are identified
The right people are engaged
The rules for participation are clear
The schedule and plan for activities are defined and appropriate to the topic and goals
Meeting schedule, frequency, and level of commitment are appropriate to the goals.
Any meeting participant pre-work has been defined and communicated. Sufficient context has been provided. Materials have been provided.
Chart of meeting techniques matched to the meeting type, purpose and objectives they are suitable for achieving.
Small, medium,large/light weight, medium weight, heavy weight
Shared vision vs persuasion
Product Working Session - targeted outcome
Decision Making/consensus building
There are many guides for planning and managing meetings. Some of these are applicable to EA in higher ed. Many are not. Some that have been touched on in this discussion include the following:
Meeting activity techniques enumerated in liberatingstructures.com (managing)
Techniques as used in U. Wash [link] (Planning)
What? So What? Now What? (Managing)
To… In a way that… so that… (6 interrogatives: who, what, when, where, how, why) (Managing)
Managing best practices
Best Practices for all meeting types:
Punctuality (allowing for people’s constraints, e.g., having to travel across campus from another meeting)
[ examples of handling digressions, or slippage ]
[ examples for handling parking lot]
[examples for handling locked contention ]
When the right people are not available or the people are not prepared, it may be okay to end the meeting early. But, depending upon the importance of the relationship, it may be better to use some of the meeting to ensure that a subsequent meeting can be successful e.g. by clarifying goals and expectations.
Ideally, the meeting contributors are different from the facilitator. A neutral facilitator can keep the meeting from seeming too heavy-handed.
If a separate facilitator is not available, it is important that the facilitator clarifies that role and is transparent.
Powered by a free Atlassian Confluence Community License granted to internet2. Evaluate Confluence today.