Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Note
If your SP deployment depends on the R&S entity attribute in IdP metadata, please read on. Otherwise there is nothing further you need to do.

An SP configuration that deployment that depends on the R&S entity attribute in IdP metadata almost certainly recognizes the legacy incommon.org R&S entity attribute value:

...

since IdPs that support global R&S will necessarily carry the latter in their metadata. Indeed, R&S IdPs from other federations will carry the refeds.org R&S tag exclusively.Today an InCommon IdP that supports global R&S (i.e., releases attributes to ALL R&S SPs) has a multivalued R&S entity attribute in its metadata. Eventually this multivalued R&S entity attribute will be removed.

Warning
titleAn SP configuration MUST NOT rely on the multivalued R&S IdP carries a single-valued entity attribute in IdP metadataits metadata
An If an SP configuration depends on the R&S entity attribute in IdP metadata, it SHOULD recognize both R&S tags independently but it MUST NOT rely on the multivalued entity attribute in any way. Eventually every R&S IdP will have a single-valued R&S entity attribute in metadata. A timeline for doing so has not yet been determined.

...

carry either the incommon.org R&S tag

...

or the refeds.org R&S tag

...

, but

...

not both. An SP that depends on the

...

R&S entity attribute in IdP metadata must take this fact into account.

For example, an SP that filters metadata to restrict its discovery interface to R&S IdPs only might do the following...