{table-plus:width=100%|columnAttributes=width=15%,width=85%}
|| Dates || Task ||
| By Feb. 1 | Finalize review team - Determine registries subgroup members, agree on review process. |
| 2/1-2/8 | Agree on evaluation questions, set review taskforce meeting times |
| 2/29 - 3/30 | Review ID Match options (review high level strawman proposal Benn already developed, evaluate [OpenEMPI\|http://openempi.kenai.com/] as option for OSIdM4HE ID Match, make recommendation about next steps (write new app, agree on strawman for high level) |
| 3/30\- 4/15 | Agree on investment structure for ID Match |
| 4/16\- 6/15 | Write ID Match code or develop reference implementation with OpenEMPI\\ |
| 6/16 - 8/15 | Testing, bring up as parallel service at UCSF |
| 3/30-4/15 | Plan investment structure for Registry |
| 2/10 - 2/24 | PSU, OR, and KIM respond to evaluation questions |
| 2/25 - 3/9 | Evaluation team reviews responses, generates more detailed questions to be addressed during code review |
| 3/12 - 3/16 | Code review of PSU Registry |
| 3/19 - 3/23 | Code review of OpenRegistry (Rutgers) |
| 3/26 - 3/30 | Review KIM registry |
| 3/31 - 4/15 | Develop Registry recommendation for OSIdM4HE |
{table-plus} |