Registry Workstream Tasks

By Feb. 1

Finalize review team - Determine registries subgroup members, agree on review process.

2/1-2/8

Agree on evaluation questions, set review taskforce meeting times

2/29 - 3/30

Review ID Match options (review high level strawman proposal Benn already developed, evaluate OpenEMPI\ as option for OSIdM4HE ID Match, make recommendation about next steps (write new app, agree on strawman for high level)

3/30- 4/15

Agree on investment structure for ID Match

4/16- 6/15

Write ID Match code or develop reference implementation with OpenEMPI

6/16 - 8/15

Testing, bring up as parallel service at UCSF

3/30-4/15

Plan investment structure for Registry

2/10 - 2/24

PSU, OR, and KIM respond to evaluation questions

2/25 - 3/9

Evaluation team reviews responses, generates more detailed questions to be addressed during code review

3/12 - 3/16

Code review of PSU Registry

3/19 - 3/23

Code review of OpenRegistry (Rutgers)

3/26 - 3/30

Review KIM registry

3/31 - 4/15

Develop Registry recommendation for OSIdM4HE