|
Agenda for next call
We are working on formalizing our architecture review process because currently, it's pretty ad hoc. I have three high level questions:
1. How do you decide when you need an architecture review? What does the scope of work need to be? Or does everything get reviewed?
2. When you perform a review what questions do you ask and how do the answers inform your recommendations?
3. Do your recommendations have any teeth? Can you enforce them? If so, what is your governance mechanism?
We follow the Internet2 Intellectual Property Framework: http://www.internet2.edu/membership/ip.html