| Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5m | Roll Call & Request For Scribe | LEK |
|
| 5m | Review of prior meeting and agenda | LEK | |
| 25m | Discuss framework and reach consensus | All | |
| 20m | Discuss elements under attributes | All | |
| 5m | Next steps | All |
We reviewed the first page intro to the model.
General agreement that this is fine just now
Jose suggested there could be a clarifying illustration of where EA fits in the enterprise
There could be more on the high level goals and value proposition of EA as a function
There could be definitions of terms in a glossary or part of the introduction
We discussed the levels of the model.
Agreed on five levels
Revised some headings from “ing” to “ed”, to reflect that in the middle levels, the cells will contain criteria for what constitutes maturity at that level -- whereas at level 0, initiation is in progress, and at level 5, continuous improvement is in progress
We discussed the scope of EA.
The maturity levels don’t map to scope; scope is a “row”; a high maturity practice could choose to not expand into business domains
In general scope of coverage should not be a measure of maturity
We discussed the Coverage section.
We probably need to blow out the items here in more detail to make sure we agree on the categories.
We discussed what goes in a cell. Is it:
What you are able to do at this level
A capability you need to have to be at this level
An activity you typically do at this level
An activity you need to do to achieve a capability
An outcome achieved at this level