You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 55 Next »

Performance WG Face-to-Face Meeting

at Internet2 Spring Member Meeting

Monday, April 27, 2009

Internet2 Update [Jeff Boote]

An update on the software releases available for Internet2 performance and measurement tools and a preview of the roadmap.

REDDnet's Use of Performance Tools [Ezra Kissel]

REDDnet has disk depots that cache data placed throughout the U.S, and they have been experiencing challenges moving data between the depots.

View the REDDnet presentation

Highlights:

  • REDDnet provides "Working storage" to help manage the logistics of sharing, moving and staging large datasets across wide areas and distributed collaborations.
  • Participating Institutions: Vanderbilt, Tennessee, Stephen F. Austin, NC State, Nevoa Networks, Delaware
  • Host Sites: Caltech, Florida, Michigan, ORNL, SDSC, TACC, UC Santa Barbara (Stephen F. Austin, Tennessee, Vanderbilt)
  • Tools used for performance monitoring inlcude:
    • OWAMP (3.1)
    • BWCTL (1.3)
    • NDT client (3.5)
    • perfSONAR-PS perfSONAR-BUOY (regular testing framework for bwctl)
  • Performance monitoring includes:
    • TCP tuning on all hosts
    • Picked a set of hosts to investigate from the "worst offenders"
    • Divide and conquer approach (Test from depot to POP, Divide path, Narrow down where the problem "ends")
    • Examples:
      • REDDnet Umich and CHIC I2 POP
      • REDDnet Vanderbilt to Atlanta I2 POP

 Internet2 and Cisco Telepresence [Aaron Brown]

A behind-the-scenes look at the planning and setup for the Cisco Telepresence Demo shown at Wednesday's General Session.

Aaron Brown presented on "Regular Latency Monitoring Or: How I Learned to Start Worrying and Hate the Jitter"

View the slides

Highlights

  • Throughput testing is being done by LHC, ESNET and others
  • But what about latency testing for latency sensitive applications such as Cisco Telepresence Demo?
  • Cisco Telepresence Limits
    • 10 ms jitter
    • 160 ms delay
    • 0.05% loss
  • Polycom Limits
    • 30-35 ms jitter
    • 300 ms delay
    • <1% loss
  • Goals:
    • Measure delay/jitter/loss between  points
    • Be able to fix any issues that come up
  • Approach: Deployed measurement machines at the endpoints and set up regular tests between the machines
    • Tools: : perfSONAR-BUOY and OWAMP
    • Analysis software was written or modified to make it easy to view and understand the data.
  • Several potential issues identified, and all were solved and verified through diagnostics and monitoring

Interoperability Testing with Europe - Update

[John Moore, Matthew Zekauskas, Tom Throckmorton]

An update on the Multi-Vendor 10 Gigabit Testing that Matt Zekauskus and Tom Throkmorton discussed at the WG at the Feb. 2009 Joint Techs in College Station.

 Assembling a PERT team in the U.S.

http://www.geant2.net/server/show/conWebDoc.1602
Discussion of establishing a team of network engineers representing each of the RONs that would be available on a rotating basis to troubleshoot complex, multi-domain issues.

 WG Charter

Carla presented the draft WG Charter, and invited comments.  Carla would like volunteers to serve with her as a  co-chair of the working group.

  • No labels