SOA Working Group

2012 environmental scan of SOA in higher education

The ITANA SOA Working Group is reviewing SOA implementation projects, SOA software development projects, standards, technologies and resources for higher education. The goal is to complete an environmental scan of SOA in Higher Education in 2012.

Interested in participating? Please contact Leo Fernig at leo.fernig@ubc.ca

Members

The SOA Working Group consists of:

• Leo Fernig. Enterprise Architect. University of British Columbia. (leo.fernig@ubc.ca) (Facilitator)
• Glenn Donaldson. Senior Application Architect, OCIO Enterprise Applications/Ent. Architecture. The Ohio State University. (donaldson.6@osu.edu)
• Scott Fullerton.  Senior IT Architect.  University of Wisconsin--Madison. (sfullerton@wisc.edu)
• Richmond Stevenson, Assistant Vice President, Enterprise Architecture and Strategy  (UMUC), richmond.stevenson@umuc.edu
• Piet Niederhausen (Georgetown) niederhp@georgetown.edu
• Keith Hazelton, Sr IT Architect, UW-Madison, Internet2 Middleware, (hazelton@wisc.edu)
• Dave Perhne, Application Architect, University of Michigan (dcp@umich.edu)
• Philip Robinson, Assistant Director, Integration, CIT Applications, Cornell University (philip.robinson@cornell.edu)

Contacts

Experts who have shared their knowledge and experience. List

Questionnaires

Questionnaires to use in interviews and surveys. Note: the actual questionnaires are Google forms. There are two versions:

• Questionnaire for institutions
• Questionnaire for products
  There are explanatory notes to be used in conjunction with the questionnaire.

Working Documents

The SOA Working Group will be developing the following working documents:

• SOA and Identity
• Institutional SOA Projects
• SOA Software Development Projects
• SOA Vertical Standards
• SOA Technologies
• SOA Resources

Survey results

This section tabulates the results of the various sections of the survey in a format that is more readable than the Google spreadsheet.
The Survey Themes area is a sandbox in which to record unstructured reflections on the survey results.

• Section 1: Survey respondents
• Section 2: SOA maturity of your organization
• Section 3: Industry (vertical) standards
• Section 4: Web Service Integration Capabilities
• Section 5: SOA governance
• Section 6: Data governance
• Section 7: Identity and access management
• Section 8: SOA design principles
• Section 9: SOA technologies
• Section 10: Cost benefit analysis
• Section 11: Individual SOA projects

Meetings and minutes

The working group meets 11:00 - 12:00 PT the 2nd Wednesday of each month in 2012.
Agendas and minutes