You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 20 Next »

Ratings:

  • 1=Ad-hoc
  • 2=Basic
  • 3=Standardized
  • 4=Managed
  • 5=Adaptive

 

Business

 

Program management

 

Governance

 

Architecture

 

Operations

 

People

 

Enabling technologies

 

 

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

UBC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Michigan

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

Cornell

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

Georgetown

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

Ohio State

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2.2

If you have indicated a significant change in your maturity level, can you describe the projects that have done most to advance that maturity?

Ohio State
Central IT Integration Architecture definition, initial development projects using SOA techniques and web services between ERP systems

2.3

If there has been a significant change, can you identify the top 3 drivers for that change?
Ohio State
The need for enterprise integration of back-end administrative systems (HR, Finance, Student), The need for better Master Data Management, The need for greater agility, Executive leadership (CIO or Enterprise Architecture)

  • No labels