Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

Ratings:

  • 1=Ad-hoc
  • 2=Basic
  • 3=Standardized
  • 4=Managed
  • 5=Adaptive

 

Business

 

Program management

 

Governance

 

Architecture

 

Operations

 

People

 

Enabling technologies

 

 

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

2007

2012

UBC

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Michigan

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

Cornell

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

Georgetown

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

Ohio State

1

2

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2.2

If you have indicated a significant change in your maturity level, can you describe the projects that have done most to advance that maturity?

Ohio State
Central IT Integration Architecture definition, initial development projects using SOA techniques and web services between ERP systems

  • No labels