You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Conference Call Info: Video Bridge 22104

  1. Dial the Auto Attendant at 812-856-7060
  2. Enter the conference number (22104) followed by the # key (e.g., 22104#)

Attendees

Who

With

 

Benn Oshrin

Internet2 / Various

(tick)

Eric Westfall

Indiana U / Kuali

(error)

Jessica Coltrin

U of Arizona / Kuali

(tick)

Jimmy Vuccolo

PSU

(tick)

Lucas Rockwell

UCSF

 

Renee Shuey

PSU

(tick)

RL "Bob" Morgan

U. Washington / Internet2

 

Steven Carmody

Brown

(tick)

Matt Sargent

Indiana U / Kuali

 

Dedra Chamberlin

UCB

(tick)

Omer Almatary

Rutgers

(tick)

Dave Steiner

Rutgers

 

Agenda

  1. Introductions/Roll Call
  2. Updates from F2F Meeting

Action Items

Notes

dedra - lot of discussion on the work stream for the registry. some milestones and timelines were set for the next few months with governance questions.
identity match and core registry were the main ones for this group and decided to keep on the same work stream. UC has come to the conclusion that ID Match is best done as a stand alone component. Benn's been working with that and has a straw man out there. For identity match we need to really look at the existing items that have been looked at prior, goal is to complete that by the end of Feb. with a recommendation on which to go with (KIM, PSU, OpenRegistry)

benn - the over arching strategy group talked about funding and such...

renee - was there any discussion about how this in-depth veal will be done and by who

dedra - not really, after the meeting though I asked the kuali group to put forward some folks to participate in the eval. I know that the UC group has folks, would like PSU and some UW folks involved. Do we want a diff group of people or should we use this existing group? Should have a PM assigned to keep track of and by when, to keep things going forward. ideally this group will weigh in...

renee - early on we talked about having some Kuali folks review the PSU code, not sure if we were thinking about having one team...

dedra - that would be more effective I think. if we try to tackle it individually, it would probably take too long. eric and bill are looking at when Kuali could buy into it. using the subgroup as we can for now. seems to me that this group could be the one to do the formal evaluation. just need to find the steps and what from there...need a PM approach at this stage. making some decisions about this is a top priority for me, i'd be willing to offer my time.

renee - i think that's a great offer

dedra - see if we can't get some sign off of the PM and the members and see if the team is complete. That we're getting the input we need.

  • No labels