OSIdM4HE-Strategy&Org. call, 5pm - 6pm (ET) Friday, 8/19/2011
Participants
Who |
With |
Present |
---|---|---|
Tom Barton |
U Chicago |
√ |
Dedra Chamberlin |
Berkeley & UCSF |
|
Jacob Farmer |
Indiana U |
√ |
Keith Hazelton |
UW-Madison / Internet2 |
√ |
RL "Bob" Morgan |
U Dub / Internet2 |
|
Benn Oshrin |
Internet2 / Various |
|
Hampton Sublett |
UC Davis |
√ |
Bill Yock |
U Dub/Rice Board |
√ |
AGENDA
1. Convene
2. Agenda Bash
3. AI review
- [OSIdM4HEteam:RL-Bob] Documenting the gaps that have no team (yet). AuthN is one example.
- Done Draft charter/position paper for S&O Team with thoughts on how we make progress toward our goals
- Done Draft someone from the Access Management Team to join S&O so we have all teams represented on our calls
- Done Create wiki page for our IAM Market Survey planning
- Done Ask SteveO to create @internet2.edu mailing list for the S&O Team and subscribe all members
4. Review Charter/Position Paper (HamptonS)
- DedraC: Actual university needs-based use case driven design; TomB: One of requirements that org should address: incorporating univ-based dev/impl. projects.
5. Review Bill Yock's draft on Investment and Governance Models
- Contributing partner w cash rather than in-kind developer FTE, as a Contributing Partner
- MOU or agreement on expenditures;
- BY: E.g., MOU each site kicks in 4 FTE; could be that those 8 FTE build out KIM; the same 8 may collaborate on building out Grouper.
- BennO: Sliding scale; JASig hat on: we need to be flexible enough to welcome contributions from individual donors. TomB: If there's a venture partner, it's singular; may be looking at an amalgam of efforts.
- BillY: Needs to be more than a single partner. Most Kuali projects are incubated via several institutional agreements for particular engagement. Very hybrid model.
- BillY: Kuali roadmap has IAM a couple years down the road, may be quite willing to partner with something like OSIdM4HE to get the IAM work done sooner. E.g. HR payroll & Student have a big interest in this. The gov. structure has to meet the requirements of the partners. If Kuali is not in full control, perception of risk; however, they're at risk because the resources aren't there. Split off the IAM roadmap
- JacobF: I like fact that the hidden benefit is getting to piggy-back on a lot of institutional maturity. Discrete ventures that have a relationship w existing initiative, Kuali. Acutely concerned with sustainability. committment at institutional level
- TomB: Must be built here syndrome related to that. Would be hard for PennState.
- If IU commits n FTE, LIGO wants one feature.
- Benn w Jasig hat: this
- TomB: Bill, thanks! I'm on vacation next week. KeithH, I'll call on Saturday
- Hampton IRC roadmap, Jacob?
6. Begin Planning for Marketing Survey
7. Explore Need for a Cross-Team Set of Enterprise Infrastructure Requirements
8. Review New Action Items