OSIdM4HE-Strategy&Org. call, 5pm - 6pm (ET) Friday, 8/19/2011

Participants

Who

With

Present

Tom Barton

U Chicago

  √

Dedra Chamberlin

Berkeley & UCSF

 

Jacob Farmer

Indiana U

  √

Keith Hazelton

UW-Madison / Internet2

  √

RL "Bob" Morgan

U Dub / Internet2

 

Benn Oshrin

Internet2 / Various

 

Hampton Sublett

UC Davis

  √

Bill Yock

U Dub/Rice Board

  √

 
 
AGENDA

1. Convene

2. Agenda Bash

3. AI review

  • [OSIdM4HEteam:RL-Bob] Documenting the gaps that have no team (yet). AuthN is one example.
  • Done Draft charter/position paper for S&O Team with thoughts on how we make progress toward our goals
  • Done Draft someone from the Access Management Team to join S&O so we have all teams represented on our calls
  • Done Create wiki page for our IAM Market Survey planning
  • Done Ask SteveO to create @internet2.edu mailing list for the S&O Team and subscribe all members

4. Review Charter/Position Paper (HamptonS)

  • DedraC: Actual university needs-based use case driven design; TomB: One of requirements that org should address: incorporating univ-based dev/impl. projects.
  •  

5. Review Bill Yock's draft on Investment and Governance Models

  • Contributing partner w cash rather than in-kind developer FTE, as a Contributing Partner
    • MOU or agreement on expenditures; 
    • BY: E.g., MOU each site kicks in 4 FTE; could be that those 8 FTE build out KIM; the same 8 may collaborate on building out Grouper.
    • BennO: Sliding scale; JASig hat on: we need to be flexible enough to welcome contributions from individual donors.  TomB: If there's a venture partner, it's singular; may be looking at an amalgam of efforts.
    • BillY: Needs to be more than a single partner. Most Kuali projects are incubated via several institutional agreements for particular engagement. Very hybrid model.
    • BillY: Kuali roadmap has IAM a couple years down the road, may be quite willing to partner with something like OSIdM4HE to get the IAM work done sooner.  E.g. HR payroll & Student have a big interest in this.  The gov. structure has to meet the requirements of the partners.  If Kuali is not in full control, perception of risk; however, they're at risk because the resources aren't there. Split off the IAM roadmap
    • JacobF: I like fact that the hidden benefit is getting to piggy-back on a lot of institutional maturity.  Discrete ventures that have a relationship w existing initiative, Kuali. Acutely concerned with sustainability. committment at institutional level
    • TomB: Must be built here syndrome related to that. Would be hard for PennState.
    • If IU commits n FTE, LIGO wants one feature.  
    • Benn w Jasig hat: this
    • TomB: Bill, thanks!  I'm on vacation next week. KeithH, I'll call on Saturday
    • Hampton IRC roadmap, Jacob? 

6. Begin Planning for Marketing Survey

7. Explore Need for a Cross-Team Set of Enterprise Infrastructure Requirements

8. Review New Action Items

  • No labels