Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Excerpt
TIER Entity Registry Requirements Not Met by

COmanage 1.0.2 Compared to the TIER Entity Registry Requirements

  • COmanage Registry 1.0.2  (note: Handle (some) Gaps via a plugin architecture of Comanage, some however are not solvable in this manner per Benn O)
    • Lacks public APIs by which System of Records can 1) notify the Registry of persons that are new to the SoR and 2) persist relevant SoR-sourced person information in the Registry
    • Currently Account management is a POC only,  more effort seems to be required to move this past the POC stage
    • .  external vs internal provisioning needs to be expanded and enhanced
    • Batch / File Processing :  inbound formats able to be defined as a future feature... currently lacking in following areas:
        • administration

        • capability for proxy/delegate on attribute of self service out of box

        • bulk loading  - half way there

        • enterprise vocabulary at UI - needs noodling and review.

      • Person

        • lifecycle

        • mulitple roles

        • self selcted netid (not available)

        • data privacy - considerations  (not there)

        • enroll via console operation then HR or whatever bringing those together have opportunities to improve

        • MatchingId

        •  Proofing - what is to be tracked, VO typically not doing this, role to credential management maybe

      • Provisioing

...