...
- The AAC is working to revise its charter to do more than manage the assurance process for certification.
- The AAC is looking at what needs to be modified to increase trust within the federation.
- This does not expand a lot the AACs charge. But it is broader than managing a process.
- We have received lots of feedback (from our SP partners) on the lack of usefulness of the POP and the lack of Compliance. Some InCommon participants are not updating their POPs.
- We have talked about decomposing the assurance profiles into trust marks to drive incremental progress within the federation.
- The goal is to get people on the road to higher trust and higher assurance.
- There is work at GA Tech on Trust Marks https://trustmark.gtri.gatech.edu/the-pilot/
EricG asks, there is Vectors of Trust group. Here at UC, he is taking
https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/msg13215.html
The UC system is are is taking a similar approach in standards within UC. For , for incremental progress short of silver.
Is there a sense of what the scope of these trustmarks the trustmarks (being discussed by the AAC_ might be? Eric wants Wants to do things that would map to trustmarks. Looking for , are Are there specific targets that would be more be useful for us to use?
SteveD: The AAC's work on this work is not super far alongis at the beginning
The GA Tech people have done a lot of work
Have broken 863 800-63 into trustmarks.
SteveD has thrown things onto paper.
...