Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: punctuation nit-picking

...

  1. Update (and make current) the set of use cases developed by the Social Identities Working Group. This should include use cases for both of these situations: 
    1. Social account linked to a campus-issued identity
    2. Social account used by a non-community member.
  2. Identify and document properties of social accounts that could be of interest to an application accepting authentication events from the prominent social account providers.
  3. Define and document how a gateway would represent the properties of a social account to an application.
  4. Document, and identify properties and pro's and con's of, of a central gateway approach versus a local gateway approach. 
  5. Provide application owners with recommendations on risk profiles when using social identities. (These profiles need not be based on the traditional 800-63 categories.) List and describe various approaches to trust elevation.
  6. Collect and comment on approaches that campuses are taking to do "account linking".
    1. Identify the  properties a social account must/could possess which would affect using it in this way.
    2. Linking a campus account to a known social account, and linking a social account to an existing campus-issued account, where both accounts are used by the same person.
    3. Using a social account's credentials and authentication method to authenticate to a campus-issued account.
    4. Develop recommendations for ways that campus-owned attributes could be asserted following authentication with a social account (eg group memberships)
  7. Produce a set of longer-lived recommendations for practitioners, roughly comparable to the NMI-DIR documents (eg papers, not just wiki pages).

...