Box of End Entities Registry
The service is not intended to be a replacement for federation or interfed, but is intended to be a tool supporting such activities.
The trust associated with the entries in BEER, is based on demonstrated ownership of the domain
The service is not intended to address the privacy dimensions of this problem space. Federations that import metadata from BEER are expected to address privacy considerations such as ARP's themselves.
Registrants come to the service with the expectation that they are publishing their metadata without constraint. Federations that use BEER may well constrain what information they import.
As a service provider, The Czech medical atlas wants a single point of registration metadata in order to cut down on the work that they need to do with all the federations that want to use the medical atlas.
As a service provider, the spaces wiki wants to have...
As a service provider, the REfeds wiki
As a consumer of metadata from BEER, I want the metadata to be a full representation of all the data in BEER about the entity in question in order to not depend on proprietary interfaces
As a registrant, I want to be able to manage key rollover for my entities in order to not reregister full metadata
As a registrant I want the system to be able to support SAML metadata, OpenId metadata and IMI metatadata in order to be able to support multiple federation technologies.
As a consumer I want to have the system produce schema valid SAML 2 metadata.
As an consumer I need clarity on IP rights issued by the service in order to avoid legal problems on publishing the metadata.
As a consumer of metadata, I want the metadata to be available in multiple publication protocols, including an MDX endpoint. At least one publication protocol should be some of revision or versioning system.
As a registrant, I want to be able to import metadata from well-known locations based on SAML based approaches. Primarily One-time thing.
As a registrant I want the system to be able to refresh the metadata fetched from a previously specified (known) location.
As a registrant, I want to be notified about required changes to metadata, including certificate and metadata expiration. Either by certificate expiration or on a regular basis.
As a manager of BEER, I need to be able to add additional XML schema to the metadata evaluation mechanism in order to support future development.
As a consumer of metadata I need to know and understand the level of assurance with md published by BEER in order to support my business processes.
As a consumer, I require clarity on the LOA associated with each part of the published md. (Know what
As a consumer I need contact info for all metadata
As a consumer, I want the problems of md in order to evaluate its trustworthiness.
As a consumer, I need a human-readable descriptor of each entity. As a registrant I want to be able to insert a human-readable descriptior.
As a registrant, I want to be able to delete my md, even though it may not purge all traces of my md.
As a registrant, I want the service to publish appropriate caching hints in order to ensure that stale metadata doesn't live forever.
As a registrant, I want to be able to transfer control of md (permission to modify)
We have a set of user stories that are sufficient to set up a first generation BEER service.
Prioritization is next for the service, not the tool
Stick this on spaces.
Conf call next week.
The Janus use cases have either been labeled non-goals or included in the above list. Jacob will reword the BEER use cases and include those from Janus.
Janus may need to have too much ripped out to just do these services. Either a fork or a new code.