...
- MC reported on the outreach that she and TomB have been doing to CTAB candidates
- Steering approval for the CTAB slate could be sometime after February 4 (or asynchronous if required for time purposes)
- Steering will need a list of full CTAB and where they are from and term dates
- MC and Brett should both join the Steering call on Feb. 44, 2019
- Welcome John Pfeifer, University of Maryland, to today’s CTAB call as a guest
...
Baseline Expectations - Dispute Resolution Handling
- Albert shared Mockmock-up of Docket in Wiki: https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/BE/CDRP+Dockets+-+Committees+Onlywiki
- Copied orgs of priority 1-5 info into this wiki. Now restricted viewing
- Idea of tracking each org in the wiki for richer tracking
At top is list view - Can see detail by clicking on link, for each org not meeting baseline
- Confluence comment feature allows conversation to be tracked
- Can change status column, for example, to escalate an org to Steering
- Copied orgs of priority 1-5 info into this wiki. Now restricted viewing
- Comment: looks good for our tracking
- There was a question about those not on the docket, those to be attended to. The public docket should likely include those pending review.
- Albert: the public docket list will need to be manually maintained
- Perhaps take google tracking sheet and transform it to wiki page
- Include entity IDs as well as organization
- Could include 200-300 items
- Entity IDs are tracked in the health check reports
- Suggestion to link to page with public docket
- DavidW:
- No need for very fine grain details should
- to be available to public view
- However an IDP might want to scan list to see SPs that are used by my institution that are not meeting baseline
- An IDP might contact the SP not meeting baseline and offer to help that SP meet BE
- For an SP using federated logon as access to my service , might want to be sure the participants are meeting BE
- Want to be able to scan to be sure BE is being met by my partners.
- Want a very visible indication of where we are falling short of all of InCommon meeting BE
- An IDP might contact the SP not meeting baseline and offer to help that SP meet BE
- Suggestion for metadata explorer tool (from REFEDs)
- Currently we are focusing on metadata, but In future state of Baseline Expectations, we may be talking about supported software
- There will be a clean up task for end of any phase of baseline
- Include when the list was most recently updated
- For public listing, use an entity-based listing
- How much info to provide to community about reason an org is not meeting BE?
- Prroposal to get a list for the trust and Identity newsletter, with just 4 columns
- org name
- entity name
- entity ID
- Entity type (IDP, SP)
- AI : Albert mock up the pubic docket and share with CTAB (done)
- Currently has restricted access: https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/x/ZAJ0C
For a Future CTAB call
- Community Dispute Resolution Process - where do we start (Stage 2 vs 3)
- How will CTAB divide effort in Stage 3 review?
- Time for another tabletop exercise?
- Involving Service Desk - invite Service Desk to CTAB call during BE CDRP?
...