Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Emily Eisbruch (internet2.edu)

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Emily Eisbruch (internet2.edu)

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • [AI] Brett start a document with a proposed timeline of dates for moving from Phase 1 to Phase 2,   including proposed priorities for next steps of baseline expectations (R&S, SIRTFI, SHIBv3) and share with CTAB.  


Carry Over Action ItemItems

  • [AI] Brett reach out to EricG about 1) sharing the UCOP privacy policy info as a recommendation and 2) if EricG would be willing to draft a blog about how they are tackling the Baseline Expectations privacy policy issue at UCOP.  (not done yet)
  • [AI] Brett email   the email  the community about the final version of Community Consensus Process doc. 
  •       Consultation was here:
          https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/x/7xSMBw

...

  • Need discussion on how we move forward on the items that are assigned to CTAB
  • Tom: Recommendations are abstracted from the requirements matrix
  • CTAB should respond to the recommendations, not just to the requirements matrix
  • Kevin states that the response to the requirements matrix is probably  sufficient.
    • Once we get this kind of first pass from the working groups then we can create actionable meaning
  • David Walker is supporting CACTI in the FIM4R response
  • Best to contact Chris Phillips and David Walker on next steps
  • What is the group sensibility on these issues raised by FIM4R? Open minded thinking on making researchers’ life better
  • AI Brett will do another pass to look at the FIM4R with  a close look at  the recommendations.

Baseline Expectations Implementation Progress

...

  • Next step is to consider the recommendations  
  • Hope to touch every organization we can that is having issues meeting BE
  • Need a way to receive request from orgs needing more time to meet BE
  • Include a deadline date in the health check emails
  • SPs are still under 50% in meeting BE
  • Interesting to look at which elements are most difficult to meet in BE
    • getting contacts is a challenge
  • Some orgs are still saying “I have not heard about BE”
  • Brett and Ann will be talking with NickR and JohnK re making it easier for orgs with many Service Providers
  • Moving to Phase 2 of Baseline Expectations
    • Need to start thinking about Phase 2 planning, taking the input from the transition plan paper
    • As part of moving to Phase 2, there will be communications (webinars etc) to address any challenges that organizations are facing. This is where CTAB will likely be able to help
  • List of entities and where they stand:
  • See Roadmap for timeline  https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/BE/Baseline+Processes+Roadmap

  • What should be date/deadline for consequences for not complying with BE? Suggestions:
    • End of 2018
    • End of Jan 2019
    • For SPs… until June 2019?
  • As baseline expectations changes in the future,  will we give a year for adoption each time there is a BE change?
  • This first rollout of BE probably deserves more time than a small future change
  • Would the research community be OK with deadline for BE compliance at June 2019?
  • Gearing toward the academic year probably makes sense. This points to December instead of summer. 
  • Suggestion to set a deadline of early Dec. or end of Dec.  But take no action until sometime in January.  Note we don’t cut metadata over winter break
  • How do we engage more of the research community on this question of when to impose consequences for not meeting BE?
  • Many research organizations will likely be eager for next step of requiring R&S attribute release as part of BE
  • We need to “close up shop” on first phase of BE , before we can move to next part where we deal with R&S and SIRTFI and see much greater value

  • [AI} Brett start a document with a proposed timeline of dates for moving from Phase 1 to Phase 2,   including proposed priorities for next steps of BE (R&S, SIRTFI, SHIBv3) and share with CTAB.  

 Baseline Expectations TableTop Exercise TODOs  

...

  • developing a request form for submitting potential consensus topics and other Baseline Expectations related requests
  • fleshing out process for discuss lists and wiki pages for consensus discussions
  • modify the Baseline Expectations Process doc http://doi.org/10.26869/TI.105.1  to specify that the "concerned Party”   need need not be the only party that can take the concern they raised on to Stage 3.

Recruiting New CTAB Members

...