Versions Compared


  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


  • Brett Bieber, University of Nebraska (chair)  
  • Mary Catherine Martinez, InnoSoft (vice chair)  
  • David Bantz, University of Alaska  
  • Tom Barton, University Chicago and Internet2  
  • Chris Hable, University of Michigan  
  • Jon Miner, University of Wisc - Madison  
  • Ann West, Internet2  
  • Emily Eisbruch, Internet2 


  • Ted Hanss, University of Michigan 
  • Joanna Rojas, Duke
  • Chris Whalen, National Institute of Health regrets


    • Good to have several members of InCommon staff present along with several CTAB members
    • Engagement was successful
    • Some discussion of CTAB’s approach to its own work
    • Have an arc of consensus work for CTAB
    • Who decides when there is the end of a certain stage of the consensus?
    • Should the end of a stage go to CTAB?
    • For decisions emerging from consensus, it was decided that there should likely be an Impact statement to InCommon operations and to the community
    • If a change coming out of consensus will require substantial work from the community, there should be an expected cadence.
    • For some issues that come up for consensus, should we schedule them for later?
    • We could produce a series of events that could drive an arc of work to refine what baseline means
    • Clarifications of v1 of baseline expectations, work towards v2 of baseline expectations 
    • There will be work by InCommon staff on the COmanage steps involved in the consensus process
  • Monday July 23, 2018 at 10am ET
    • Baseline Expectations TableTop Exercise 2 on dispute resolution
    • Hope for additional feedback 

Close of consultation for Community Consensus Process Doc was July 17, 2018


Next CTAB call is - Wed. Aug 1, 2018