First Call: new branding, Steering Cmte changes, look forward to upcoming calendar, round table of what was coming in higher ed.
Beginning of Oct: signature ready EA. Review of Spring F2F. Reviewed a fair number of examples. U Mich is using some more.
Louis: liked in person exposure to material. Liked the MESA diagrams to help transition into a service oriented org.
Chris: 40 MESAs done (not yet available to public; expect them to be in early spring).
Used a capability map for higher ed. Plan to talk about that in upcoming call. Do others have capability map for higher ed? Chris suggested we define a reference capability.
Dana: drafted one over the last year. It's an attempt. It's in a spreadsheet and used for configuration management.
Jim: Piet and Jenny Jenni are working on something similar. would be interesting to get them back on the call.
Chris: make this a topic for upcoming discussion? YES.
Found focus on collaborative work needed to get signatures was quite interesting.
10/23 Spreading the EA skills across the organization: Jim's presentation. End to end business process mapping, embedded architecture, business architecture, data architecture, EA interface. There is a strong core in the EA team that needs to draw from and support federated architecture (architecture in place)
Louis: was impressed by the orchestration – facilitating collaboration, disseminating knowledge to spread the load and to work with those closest to getting the work done.
Chris: 3 challenges: explaining what we do, expressing the value, getting the resources. This call was quite helpful in addressing the third topic.
F2F: 25 people. Majored in signature-ready artifacts and minored in facilitation. Many valuable case studies.
Dana: did repurpose the strategy-on-a-page document and has been using it in an engagement. Also interested in MESA diagram
Dan: Facilitation techniques have been helpful in developing MESA diagrams.
UC Presentation on the UC System EA framework
UC System seems to have a history of being a well-integrated system. It seems to require a cohesive system to pull it off.
Ashish: Need to focus more on principles and guidelines before moving into standards.
Data Governance: Yale and Rochester presentations. More calls? and what kind of take-aways.