I'd love to get their thoughts about the remote proofing approaches on the I2 wikispaces - I talked a bit with Chad Sharp from Iowa and Steve Kurncz from MSU about this, but they had mentioned the possibility of getting some more detailed feedback at their upcoming meeting.
1. Remote identity proofing -- from Nick Roy of Iowa -- as far as I can tell institutions are not able to do remote identity proofing as described in the IAP (checking a combination of government ID numbers and financial account numbers obtained through credit bureaus or similar databases). Two alternate methods have been proposed: a) the person to be verified can appear in person with the appropriate documents and a form and have the verification confirmed by a notary public near where they live; the notarized form would serve as proof of the verification event; b) The identity documents could be verified remotely using some kind of videoconferencing technology. See https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/display/InCAssurance/Remote-Proofing+Approaches
Do the auditors think either or both of these methods can be asserted as equivalent to the approach the IAP describes? What are the issues?
...