...
- Brett Bieber, University of Nebraska (chair)
- Mary Catherine Martinez, InnoSoft (vice chair)
- David Bantz, University of Alaska
- Tom Barton, University Chicago and Internet2
- Chris Hable, University of Michigan
- Jon Miner, University of Wisc - Madison
- Ann West, Internet2
- Emily Eisbruch, Internet2
Regrets:
- Ted Hanss, University of Michigan
- Joanna Rojas, Duke
- Chris Whalen, National Institute of Health regrets
...
- Good to have several members of InCommon staff present along with several CTAB members
- Engagement was successful
- Some discussion of CTAB’s approach to its own work
- Have an arc of consensus work for CTAB
- Who decides when there is the end of a certain stage of the consensus?
- Should the end of a stage go to CTAB?
- For decisions emerging from consensus, it was decided that there should likely be an Impact statement to InCommon operations and to the community
- If a change coming out of consensus will require substantial work from the community, there should be an expected cadence.
- For some issues that come up for consensus, should we schedule them for later?
- We could produce a series of events that could drive an arc of work to refine what baseline means
- Clarifications of v1 of baseline expectations, work towards v2 of baseline expectations
- There will be work by InCommon staff on the COmanage steps involved in the consensus process
- Monday July 23, 2018 at 10am ET
- Baseline Expectations TableTop Exercise 2 on dispute resolution
- Hope for additional feedback
Close of consultation for Community Consensus Process Doc was July 17, 2018
...
- Note the Attributes Working Group was jointly sponsored by CTAB, InCommon TAC and Steering.
Next CTAB call is - Wed. Aug 1, 2018