Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 02:15:38 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1759163937.7413.1711678538927@ip-10-10-7-29.ec2.internal> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_7412_1171265330.1711678538925" ------=_Part_7412_1171265330.1711678538925 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
Thursday, June 19, 2014
Attending: Michael Gettes, Tom Barton, Nick Roy, Steve = Carmody, Ian Young, Jim Jokl, Scott Cantor, Keith Hazelton, Paul Caskey, St= eve Olshansky, David Walker, Jim Basney
With: Nate Klingenstein, John Krienke, IJ Kim, Tom Scav= o
(AI) Tom Scavo, Ann West and John Krienke will create a proposal for TAC= to consider regarding implementation of the REFEDS R&S, including a ro= admap for implementation, including a process and communications plan.
(AI) Steve Carmody will initiate the process of developing a working gro= up to deal with the larger gateway and interfederation issues.
(AI) Steve Carmody will compare the priorities spreadsheet discussed tod= ay with the original TAC document on InCommon strategic priorities and call= out major differences
Steve Carmody officially welcomed Steve Zoppi to the TAC as a =E2=80=9Cl= istening participant.=E2=80=9D
Tom Scavo reported that Ops is ready to insert a REFEDS R&S entity a= ttribute into metadata (it will be a second attribute in addition to the In= Common R&S attribute). The only significant difference between InCommon= and REFEDS R&S is that REFEDS requires an MDUI info URL (see the gap a= nalysis at https://spa= ces.at.internet2.edu/display/inctac/REFEDs+Research+and+Scholarship+Gap+Ana= lysis
TAC is in agreement with moving to the REFEDS R&S. (AI) Tom Scavo, A= nn West and John Krienke will create a proposal for TAC to consider regardi= ng implementation of the REFEDS R&S, including a roadmap for implementa= tion, including a process and communications plan.
Steve Carmody recommended that TAC adopt the proposal made by Keith Haze= lton on the email thread:
There is rough consensus among TAC to proceed with this proposal, while = addressing the larger questions that are posed, such as the impact on suppo= rt for multiple metadata bundles, tagging, other issues with operationalize= eduGAIN, and communicating all of this to participants.
(AI) Steve Carmody will initiate the process of developing a working gro= up to deal with these issues.
Discussion centered on a spreadsheet attached to the meeting wiki page: = https://spaces.at.intern= et2.edu/download/attachments/48496658/Programs_Projects_2014.xlsx
The document was developed by staff to place InCommon ongoing programs a= nd activities into the list of items likely to be part of TIER. The purpose= is to determine how the TAC priorities align and to come to a decision abo= ut the TAC work plan for the next 6-9 months.
(AI) Steve Carmody will compare this spreadsheet with the original TAC d= ocument on InCommon strategic priorities and call out major differences (th= e strategic priorities document (see https://spaces.at.internet2.edu/download/attachm= ents/48496658/DRAFT-TAC-InCommonStrategicPriorities.pdf)
Thursday, July 3, 1 pm ET, Noon CT, 11 am MT, 10 am PT