Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 22:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <1581755017.7131.1711666150837@ip-10-10-7-29.ec2.internal> Subject: Exported From Confluence MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="----=_Part_7130_918511794.1711666150836" ------=_Part_7130_918511794.1711666150836 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
--
wg-SDN call notes 3/27/2014
Attending:
Da=
n Schmiedt -- willys@clemson.edu
Michael Lambert - lambert@psc.edu
Michael Van Norman -- mvn@ucla.edu
kevin mayeshiro - kmayeshiro@ucdavis.edu
Dale W. Carder - dwcarder@wisc.edu
Deniz Gurkan - dgurkan@uh.edu
Chris Small - chsmall@uw.edu
John Moore - jhm@mcnc.org
Rich Cropp - rac111@psu.edu
Dave Pokorney - dave.pokorney@flrnet.org
=
Heidi Picher Dempsey hpd@bbn.com<=
br>Agenda:
1) Agenda Bash
2) GEC19 highlights & observations
"Programmable WANs" - on-demand path changes, etc.
=
4) wg-SDN face-to-face at I2 Global Summ=
it
http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/GEC19Ag=
enda/ProgrammableWAN
Still being =
tested and developed - available for volunteering experimenters
<=
span style=3D"color: rgb(0,0,0);">Reconfiguring of racks for jumbo frame su=
pport (trying it with some f=
or testing now--not sure if we'll do more)
More info on VTS: http://groups.geni.net/geni/attachment/wiki/GEC19Agenda/Programma=
bleWAN/VTS.pdf
And, this was the first one: http://groups.geni.n=
et/geni/attachment/wiki/GEC18Agenda/GeniSdnOffering/SDN%20Overlay.pdf=
p>
GENI (GEC19) demo session: http://groups.geni.net/geni/wiki/GEC19Agenda/Eve=
ningDemoSession Interconnection of testbeds: discussi=
ons between testbed representatives Next GENI in UC-Davis at the same tim=
e with USIgnite NTAC list discussions on TR-CPS vs R&=
amp;E: can wg-sdn help? 1.3 deployment - better way to handle=
traffic with higher subscription levels Testing in labs?
No definition for SDN exchange yet: even GeorgiaTech vs StarLight is =
different
NSI + GLIF were ther=
e
GENI is lookig=
n for suggestions from people about good groups to bring in at GECs for col=
ocated sessions or joint demos, or similar work.
Degree of flexibility may be higher - how do members want their =
traffic to be treated?
QoS cap=
abilities dependent on OF 1.3: L2 profiles feeding into L3 decisions on rou=
ters
Attach profiles to traffi=
c - assess behavior expected vs observed
1.3 stuff does not exist yet.
Rate-limit traffic going into the controller
Users may not be interested in QoS =
necessarily
Deployment during =
4thQ-1stQ15 planned by I2