Review charge and discuss adoption of existing models.
Discussion item=
s
Looking for another co-chair to join Louis & J.J. to he=
lp with planning.
Should consider how EA is moving fro=
m artifact (standardization approach) to one more engaged with communities =
for aligning IT and business.
May need to address what it means fo=
r a maturity model where the EA industry is changing as well. Some of=
the standards are probably long lived, so perhaps EA maturity follows the =
same arc as business maturity.
A goal of the maturity model may be =
that it should be resilient to future EA practice changes. Should als=
o take into consideration EA as a noun vs EA as a verb.
A possible end product vision is a S=
tructure and a Practice Guide
Structure =E2=80=93 Maturity model t=
hat describe various target maturities
Practice Guide =E2=80=93 A guide tha=
t contains what an EA practice does to reach, or be at, a given maturity le=
vel.
Need to determine/decide which level=
s and attributes to address.
Political reality may cause levels f=
or each characteristics to vary.
May want to capture and understand l=
inkages and dependencies between maturity characteristics. For exampl=
e, if order to reach a high maturity level for a characteristic, one may ne=
ed to be at some minimum maturity level for another characteristic.<=
/li>
Goal for next meeting: Would like to have levels & attributes pro=
posed by next meeting