Agenda
- Strategies and criteria
- Should running your own Shib idp be added for comparison?
- Arrive at consensus for final set of alternatives
- Get volunteer fact-finders for each strategy
Call Notes
Mark Beadles, OARnet
Mark Scheible, MCNC R&E network
Steven Carmody, Brown University
Scott Koranda, Spherical Cow
Shaun Abshere, WiscNet
Dan Zweifel, Washington U St. Louis
Emmet Culley, CCC
Ben Poliakoff, Reed College
David Walker, Internet2
Janemarie Duh, Lafayette College
Tom Scavo, Internet2
- Strategies and assessment criteria grid
- Rows
- IDaaS
- Do we need a glossary of terms? Could get confusing to write.
- Describe IDaaS as out of scope
- Add examples to strategies, e.g., Netherlands for Hub and Spoke
- Add Shib in a Box as separate row
- IDaaS
- Columns
- Authentication is out of scope for SAML
- Change MFA and assurance to Multiple SAML Authn context (to what extent? could be 0, 1, or multiple)
- Group entity attributes with attribute release?
- No
- Attribute release
- Clarify
- What can be provided by the local IdMS?
- What can the data elements be?
- What needs to be facilitated for the release?
- Clarify
- Authentication is out of scope for SAML
- Rows
Action Items
- Add Shib in a Box as row
- Tap Chris from CANARIE for factfinder
- David and Janemarie do sample strategy doc and template