Page tree
Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

Community Review

This consultation is now closed. It was open from June 13, 2018 to July 17, 2018.

The final document is here.

Background

InCommon's Community Trust and Assurance Board (CTAB) is seeking feedback on the proposed Community Consensus Process. The document outlines repeatable steps the CTAB will use to facilitate community discussion and consensus in support of Baseline Expectations for Trust in Federation. This process is iterative and will change over time as the community gains experience at answering questions of consensus.  

Document for review/consultation

Relevant Related Document (for reference but not under current community review/consultation)


Change Proposals and Feedback - We welcome your  feedback/suggestions here

If you have comments that do not lend themselves well to the tabular format below, please create a new Google doc and link to it in the suggestion section below.


NumberCurrent TextProposed Text / Query / SuggestionProposer+1 (add your name here if you agree with the proposal)Action
1

e. Communication continues until rough consensus is achieved.

Rough consensus seems to be a bit ambiguous compared to the concreteness of the rest of this process. What does it mean? That most participants in the discussion agree? That everyone at least sort of agrees? Also, the process doesn’t say who will arbitrate or make the final call should rough consensus not occur.Keith Wessel
Added a footnote which describes rough consensus: We do not require complete unanimity, but strive to achieve a point where all issues brought forward have been considered and we can continue moving.  See RFC7282, "On Consensus and Humming in the IETF."





































See Also

  • No labels